Editorial standards

The Lissin Blog explains practical ways to follow news, listen to long-form material, evaluate generated summaries, and understand the editorial choices behind personalized audio. A page must answer a real reader question. We do not publish a page only because a keyword variation exists.

AI may assist research, outlining, drafting, and editing. Each article says so plainly. “Lissin Editorial” is an organizational publisher byline, not the name of a human author. We do not describe an article as human-written or human-reviewed unless that has actually happened.

Material factual claims should point to named, accessible sources. We prefer original documents, official guidance, standards, and peer-reviewed research where they fit the question. A link is not proof by itself: the cited page must support the nearby claim, and important limits should remain visible in the article.

Product descriptions are checked against public Lissin pages and current behavior. Design proposals are labeled as proposals. We do not claim guaranteed accuracy, neutrality, comprehension, productivity, or wellbeing outcomes.

We correct material errors and update an article’s modification date only when its content changes substantially. We do not refresh dates to make unchanged work appear new. To report an error, email hi@lissin.com with the article URL, the passage, and the source or evidence we should inspect.

Editorial articles do not publish private prompts, scripts, transcripts, connected-source contents, user data, signed media URLs, or internal credentials. Public shows and episodes have a separate eligibility contract on web.lissin.com. The blog does not use editorial publication as a shortcut around that contract.